A Quick Fix For The GOP On The ACA

It Lies in Cutting Some Essential Health Benefits
By George Kalogeropoulos

Reports coming out of Washington suggest that Republicans may have bitten off more than they would like to chew with repealing & replacing the ACA, with a proliferation of proposals and no consensus on which to support, or how to get the 60 Senate votes needed to turn an eventual consensus plan into law.
            There is a general consensus in the GOP to proceed with the budget reconciliation process, but if they pass the bill the House passed in 2015, it will immediately defund plan subsidies and the Medicaid expansion, setting up 25 million or more to lose their coverage right around midterm elections in 2018.
            Even a less drastic budget reconciliation bill, for example one that gets rid of the individual and employer mandates by deleting the penalties associated with them, would leave us with a, “zombie ACA”, with everything not budget-related still in place, but malfunctioning with unintended consequences.
            All this uncertainty is bad—it’s bad for the government, it’s bad for industry, and most importantly, it’s bad for the tens of millions of confused consumers trying to make informed decisions about how and if they can get health coverage.

Taking a step back

As the saying goes, when you have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. In this case, when you have a legislative majority, every problem looks like it should be solved by changing the law.
            But does that have to be the case? What if Congressional Republicans were to take a back seat and let Tom Price and the Department of Health and Human Services begin the process of reforming health reform?

Here’s what that would look like:

Tom Price gets on a call with the leadership of Aetna, UnitedHealth, Anthem, Humana, Centene, Molina, and the Big Blues. On this call, he tells them:

·The administration is committed to reforming the individual health insurance market, and to making sure it is sustainable for all stakeholders including insurers

·Health and Human Services will use its broad administrative authority under the ACA to make the public exchanges much more attractive for insurers immediately

·Essential Health Benefits, the standard benefits that all ACA plans are required to offer, can be relaxed. This is possible because while the EHBs are defined in the ACA, the plan certification process lives with HHS, an artifact of the messy way in which the ACA was passed back in 2010.

·He asks which EHBs need to be curtailed to bring the cost of plans down

·He makes it clear that HHS will look very favorably on innovative plans that cover less and cost less as a result

·To close the deal, he assures them that helping stabilize the individual market in the near term will get them a seat at the table for the longer-term redesign of health reform

If four of those seven stakeholders agree to offer plans on the public exchanges in 2018, you have a functioning individual health insurance market.
            With the relaxed EHBs, premiums will go down significantly, and with it, enrollment numbers should go up.

And breathe

A year from now, Republicans could credibly say:

The ACA was in a death spiral a year ago. Since then we’ve lowered premiums and raised enrollment with common-sense policy changes. We’ve done all that we can do without changing the law, and now Congress needs to pass a law to fix the other pieces that are broken.”
            The success of this short term “Band-Aid” approach  would make it a lot easier for Republicans a year from now to find the 60 votes they will need in the Senate to pass replacement legislation. And most importantly, the country would be spared an incredibly volatile year in which tens of millions of Americans will risk losing their health coverage.

George Kalogeropoulos is the Founder and CEO of San Francisco-based HealthSherpa. A version of this article originally appeared at The Health Care Blog.